Arch Words

Reflections on art, politics, parenting, and life in the Midwest

Name: Tess Home: St. Louis

I'm now a graduate student in public health at Washington University in St. Louis... as well as a writer, parent, and teacher. I haven't updated this blog recently, but I may come back to it in the future.


E-mail: tessthompson (at) hotmail (dot) com

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

Abducted by Aliens?

I am curious to know if any of my readers believe they have been abducted by aliens. According to an article on Slate, there are two main psychological theories of alien abduction experiences: "recovered" false memories, or abnormal brain function interpreted as alien abduction. (Of course, a third theory would be that the experiences are real, but I don't think many scientists believe that.) The article discusses the book Abducted: How People Come to Believe They Were Kidnapped by Aliens, by Susan Clancy. The writer observes,

Clancy doesn't quite grant reality status to aliens, but on the other hand, Abducted devotes much more space to abductees' stories than to her lab results. That's probably at least in part because the stories—both those that the abductees tell and the ones she tells about her research—are much more entertaining than research protocols; this is a book aimed at a general audience. But it's also because narrative is a better vehicle for understanding why people believe what they do than a set of lab results is.


I found this passage thought-provoking. Most great religious texts are narratives, not instruction manuals or scientific studies. People use stories to express their deepest beliefs.

1 Comments:

Blogger tom said...

People use stories to express their deepest beliefs.

less charitably, stories are a way of making it seem like there is information of a certain type present when it is not.

lab results are about the reliable establishment of cause and effect relationships. stories often appear to give reliable cause and effect relationships (by pushing all the buttons in your brain that say "reality," for example) but may be extremely selective or just plain wrong.

for a recent example, see this news story for an example of the conflict between compelling "story" (even one that's "true") and reliable cause-effect relationships.

anyway. . .discuss!

7:16 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home